Monday, March 4, 2024

Israeli Jews are Slaves of Zionism

 The word Zionism was coined by Theodor Herzl, a Jew, in 1897. But the concept (without a word to describe it) had been firmly documented since 1843 when Rev. Keith, an Anglican clergyman, proposed sending all the British Jews to Palestine, 'A land without a people for a people without a land,' or maybe 'A country without a people for a people without a country.' People heard him say it, and it got written down, but his exact version remains a bit of a mystery.

Many Christian believe that Jews, deicides all, must not be allowed to live with Christians, and Zionist Christians, who have enough votes to influence elections in many predominantly Christian countries, believe that Jesus cannot return until all the Jews are in Palestine. So the British Anglican clergy were, for the most part, convinced that all British Jews must be sent to Palestine, and, after the defeat of the Ottomans, the British and French divided the Ottoman Empire, splitting all the Ottoman Vilayets into many small pieces, where parts of predominantly Sunni, Shi'a , and Kurdish regions were reformed into French and British colonies with a mixture of Sunni, Shi'a, and Kurds who disliked each other and could not agree on much of anything, making it easier for the British and French to control their new colonies.

But Palestine was 92% Palestinians, so Britain sent enough Jews to make it about 40% Jewish, with animosity between Jews and Palestinians stoked so they would not be able to challenge British Imperial Rule (but then the Jews blew up the King David Hotel when it was full of British Imperial officers).

Still, the British mostly had British Palestine under British Imperial Rule, and refused to accept Jews from other European countries. The British figured Jews were a problem, but European Jews were a European problem and Europe must be prevented from inflicting their problems on any other part of the planet.

Then came WWII, and the US decided to ship all the Jews in Western Europe to Palestine.

The official US story is based on the 1958 book of Exodus by Leon Uris (made into a movie in 1960), where the Jews were forced from Europe to Palestine, they came in peace, unarmed, only to be attacked by the Arabs who wanted to finish what the Nazis started, but the Jews were miraculously saved.

In fact, the Jews were heavily armed and expelled more than 700,000 Palestinians from Palestine. Part of the blame is laid on the Arab heads of state who suggested it would be better for the Palestinians to leave Palestine where a major war would drive the Jews out, after which they could safely return, only those 700,000 Palestinians who left until the Arab armies could retake Palestine remain in refugee camps in Lebanon, Syria, and Jordan to this day. And they call their expulsion from Palestine their Nakba or catastrophe. As do most of the Palestinians who remained in Israel, where they have few rights and are under constant threat of expulsion.

The situation is complicated since, of the 7 million or so Palestinians in Israel, Israel gave 2 million passports and said they are welcome to remain in Israel, own land, vote in elections, and have full rights.

But the other 5 million Palestinians who were in Palestine before the Jews were sent from the UK and Europe are illegal aliens with no rights. Those in Ghaza were limited in what they could do, how much food they could grow or fish, and had barely enough to eat, and housing lacking many amenities. They were walled in with a wired wall that would indicate any attempt to break out or bring in food or weapons or tools or just about anything. Three battalions patrolled that wall to ensure nothing got in or out.

And then, in October 2023, the battalions were ordered to go to the West Bank, the monitors of the detection devices looking for breaches of the wall were unstaffed, and Hamas managed to blow up a section of the wall. As they explored the area near the wall, Hamas found a fortress full of sleeping Israeli Occupation Force (IOF) soldiers with no guards and the gates unlocked, so Hamas were able to kill some of the soldiers and try to kidnap the rest.

Hamas attempted to kidnap a large number of Israelis, but Israel have a policy of killing all potential hostages, and the IOF managed to kill hundreds of Israelis who might have been taken hostage. A team of propagandists were sent to study the remains of the attack by Hamas and counterattack by the IOF, and they reported that Hamas had raped and murdered women and babies, but without a shred of proof or evidence. Still, their claim remains Gospel to all the Western media, and is an essential part of the Western narrative.

That Western narrative says the only genocide was on 7 October: every Philistine in Ghaza is determined to exterminate every last Jew on Earth, and Israel must try to protect the Jews from annihilation, and the only way to achieve that is by removing all the Philistines from Ghaza.

Israel propose that Hamas surrender and release all hostages, after which some Philistines will be incarcerated, some executed, and the rest deported. The Philistines have shown no inclination to accept this, which the Western narrative says is the only possible solution, so stopping all food from going to Ghaza, destroying all crops and water facilities is essential if peace is to be brought back to Ghaza.

So far, Israel seems to have killed about 30,000 Palestinians, but deaths from thirst and starvation are just now starting, and, if Hamas do not surrender and no other country accept the Philistines, the Israeli and American governments hope this will eliminate the Philistine problem from Ghaza once and for all: no ceasefire, no food allowed into Ghaza (a few food drops into the ocean, where starving Philitines might drown trying to get it, and the food that lands on land protected by IOF machine gun fire killing all those who try to get any of it).

And, according to the Western narrative, this is altogether fitting and proper, the only possible way to deal with the Philistines in Ghaza.

Of course, the US and Israel are not the entire world, and the impact of this policy on the rest of the world remains to be seen, and how it will affect the Israeli economy and the viability of Israel as a state.

So Zionism has enslaved the Jews, and it is looking like the end will not be very good for the Jews.

Tuesday, February 6, 2024

In the news

 I remember reading back in 2022 that the Ukrainians, with ultra-advanced NATO weapons, were wiping out the Russians who only had 'outmoded and inept' weapons. I keep reading the same thing: NATO weapons have twice the range of Russian weapons and much greater accuracy, so the Ukraine have killed off more than 90% of the Russian invasion force and destroyed more than 80% of Russian armour with minimal losses. Victory is near, or, as President Brandon says, 'Russia has already lost.'

But, of course, that great victory for democracy, which did not cost a single American life, will be lost if the US do not give the Ukraine another $100 billion in cash and weapons immediately, if not sooner. And not giving those weapons to the Ukraine means many jobs making those weapons will be lost in the US.

Now we read that the Jews fled from Europe after WWII to Palestine, where they came in peace, but the fanatical jihadist Arab terrorists attacked them and tried to complete Hitler's genocide. Again and again the Jews offered peace only for the Arabs again and again trying to complete Hitler's genocide.

It seems that not everyone reiterates the Official Western Version of the facts/news/history/etc.,etc.

For starters, Lee Camp explains why all of Ben Shapiro's claims about what is happening in Israel are lies. Lee Camp calls himself an anti-Zionist Jew, while Ben Shapiro is a strongly Zionist Jew. Times change. When I was a boy and WWII and the Nazi genocide of Jews was still a fresh and vivid memory, almost all Americans were Zionists: Jews supported having Israel as a place to which they could run whenever antisemitism arose and threatened their lives, and Christians supported Zionism since Christ cannot return until every Jew is in Israel. Today, 40% of American Jews are anti-Zionist, since they believe Judaism cannot support genocide of Philistines, and they do not consider the Israeli government to be practicing the Jewish religion the way it should be practiced.

Lee Camp has a second video going into the lies in the Western media about the Ghaza and the Ukraine.

In a third short video, Tucker Carlson complains about the fact that the news keep repeating what the government tell them to repeat without bothering to report the actual news. This video is an advert to promote his interview with Putin which will soon be available for free on his website. This interview has been condemned by the US news and Congress even before it has been conducted and posted.

So three videos, the two by Lee Camp total about an hour, 20 minutes for the first and 40 minutes for the second. The Tucker Carlson ad for his upcoming interview with Putin is about four minutes.

Thursday, February 1, 2024

President Biden's Video????

 The US is dedicated to helping Israel cleanse Palestine of all the Palestinians. As President Biden said, he saw videos of Palestinians raping Jewish women and beheading Jewish babies, and the US will not allow such things.

For starters, Max Blumenthal, an anti-Zionist Jew, wrote that the Israeli hasbara of rapes and babies beheaded is entirely false.

But now PressTV, banned just about everywhere, has a new show, EXPOSÉ, that presents the refutation of the Israel/US hasbara in more detail than Blumenthal.

In the Western press, Hamas raped women and beheaded babies. But the 'proof' of any of this is sadly lacking, as in non-existent, as in the whole story of raped women and beheaded babies is either mostly or entirely a US/Israeli lie.

But no matter: Israel is another unsinkable US Aircraft Carrier, and the US will support Israel's expulsion of all the illegal Philistines in Israel. And maybe the illegal Christians as well. The fact that they have been in Palestine for at least 4,000 years and have nowhere to go is irrelevant: the US want all of Palestine in Jewish hands, and that's all that matters.

Thursday, January 25, 2024

Thomas Friedman's Latest in the New York Times

Friedman has a new column in the New York Times, with a rather limited anchor in TRVTH.

He starts by saying the world is divided into democracies and autocracies, and there is the Resistance Movement, dedicated to preserving the autocracies, and the Inclusion Movement who want to join the Democracies.

The Ukrainians are all in the Inclusion Movement, fighting hard to join the democracies as Putin is futilely trying to keep them under his autocracy. This is only costing the US a few dollars, the Ukrainians are doing all the dying that NATO must spend to stop the evil Putin, so the Ukrainians are saving American lives.

And the war has cost Putin 90% of all the soldiers in the Russian army and most of his tanks. Putin only has outmoded Soviet and Czarist weapons while NATO weapons have twice the range and much greater accuracy, so the Ukrainians have destroyed Putin's army at the cost of a relatively few Ukrainian lives.

I've seen this reiterated in all the Western media. Not just the New York Times, but CNN, the BBC, and Yahoo News.

Of course, those actually in the Ukraine reporting have rather a different take, but what do they know? To report accurately about the Ukraine one should do most of the writing in New York and London and Paris and Berlin, getting your information from your government's information office. A trip to Kiev is OK, but don't go into the Ukrainian countryside or you could end up like Gonzalo Lira, and that would be entirely your own fault.

Don't believe Russian disinformation that it is Russia that killed off at least three Ukrainian armies, and the Ukraine are now drafting women, even pregnant women, since Russia have killed off most of the male draftees.

Officially, Russia were just like Saudi Arabia, selling energy to Europe and using the money to buy everything they needed from Europe. Sanctions cut off all their money, so the Russian military had no financial support and had to use old, inept, outmoded, and in very poor repair Soviet and even Czarist weapons, and had very little ammunition. Ignore the fact that the PRC where, when I was a boy, people dreamed of someday owning a bicycle but knowing that was just a dream, is now the country with the most cars and which buys the most oil, and pays more than the super discounted price Russia gave to Europe to buy their friendship. The PRC, where those in the north were barely able to keep their homes above freezing in the winter, now provide ample heat, and so buy more gas than any other nation. So Russia had money and materials coming in and restarted all the industries closed when Russia were buying almost everything from Europe. And the Russian defence industry is now the most advanced in the world. Remember, all the West, all the Western news media say that is all just Russian disinformation. All the Russian defence industry was outsourced to Europe, so their military only had outmoded and inept equipment, and all the Russian soldiers have been killed and all the Russian tanks destroyed by the brave, well trained, and well equipped Ukrainians. But we do need to give the Ukraine a lot more money, but that's still cheap at half the price.

Meanwhile, Hamas and Iran are also in that Resistance Movement, while Israel and Saudi Arabia are very much in the Inclusion Movement. Saudi will soon be 'a Dubai on steroids' according to Friedman, and will work closely with Israel to join the Democracies of the world.

OK, I'm close enough to see Saudi and Israel, and that Inclusion Movement and their rush toward Democracy don't look all that much better than the autocracy movement, rather worse if one looks too closely.

So stick with Friedman and the New York Times: the Hamas attack on 7 October was unendurable, and Israel have the right to self defence. Israel are providing food and medical care to the Ghazans injured by Hamas, so all claims of genocide are pure lies. The Ghazans can't see that food, and nor can I, but if Friedman and the New York Times say Israel is providing the Ghazans more than enough food and medical care, we must believe him and not our own eyes. His information is much better than ours. Some say that, as an occupying power, international law does not, in fact, give Israel any right to self defence, and certainly no right to block all food going into Ghaza, but Friedman knows what International Law should be, favouring the US as the Leader of Democracy, so whatever the US does and supports is the Law, not what's written in some old books like the ones still available in South Africa that they tried to bring before the ICJ. Nothing Israel does can be considered genocide when the US says it can't possibly be genocide.

As Friedman concludes, Netanyahu hoped to convince Saudi to fully join the Inclusion Movement without giving the slightest concession to the Ghazans, when it would be so easy to get diplomatic recognition by Saudi for Israel if Netanyahu would offer some minuscule, insignificant token and call it full freedom for the Palestinians. No need to give any real concessions, just some meaningless, token concessions, but Netanyahu says Saudi are so desperate to be in the Inclusion Movement that not even a token will be necessary, Saudi will eventually come round, the Inclusion Movement is just too tempting to resist.

And this is making it harder and requiring more time, and Friedman can't understand why Netanyahu is doing this when that meaningless concession would be so much easier and quicker.

Tuesday, January 23, 2024

Palestine and Zionism

The word 'Zionism' was coined by a Jew in the second half of the 19th century. The idea was formed by an Anglican clergyman named Rev. Keith in the first half of the 19th century: he said 'Palestine is a land without a people for a people without a land.' The Anglican clergy did not want Jews, whom they considered deicides, living in the UK, they wanted them all sent back to Palestine.

The Greeks transliterated the Hebrew word as Φιλιστιν, or Philistine. The Romans transliterated it as Palestine. The first Hebrew letter can be pronounced like the Greek Φ or the Roman P, and the vowels are not written in Hebrew. But in the 19th century, the Roman province of Palestine was a small part of the Ottoman vilayet of Syria. Then the Ottoman Empire somehow found themselves as part of the Central Powers in WWI, and lost, and all their Asian vilayets were chopped up and split between the French and the British, and the British got Palestine and Jordan, both formerly parts of Syria, and the French got Syria and Lebanon, both also once parts of Syria. And the British wrote the Balfour Declaration and the Mandate that Palestine was for British Jews. The UK would have liked to force all UK Jews to Palestine, and they got quite a few to go. Palestine went from almost all Palestinians to about 30% British Jews.

Russian Jews, about half of all Jews worldwide, were in the Pale, and suffered pogroms, so some of them wanted to go, but the British said Palestine was only for UK Jews. And anyway, the Russian Empire ended, and the USSR banned ethnic groupings and religion, so there were no Jews in the USSR, but anyone caught practicing the Jewish religion, or any other religion, would be punished. And no one was allowed to leave the USSR. Or the Warsaw Pact, for that matter (but a few managed to escape).

The Nazis wanted a Judenfrei Europe, but, again, the UK said that, while all Jews are a problem, European Jews were a European problem and the Royal Navy would prevent any from being shipped out of Europe. So the Nazis rounded up the Jews, put them in Concentration Camps, which were originally not so bad, a German confined in one in the early '30s wrote that he was there for a year or so and nothing bad happened. But, with WWII, the Axis was short of food, so they starved those in the Concentration Camps, and, as one starves, the immune system weakens and the inmates started getting bad infections and infecting the guards, so the Germans ordered anyone who could not work be killed and the body burned.

The best estimates are that the Germans murdered between 4.5 million to 6 million Jews.

There is, of course, one and only one war crime: losing the war. After they lost the war, any German who had anything to do with killing Jews was severely punished by the Allies.

The Germans also killed Slavs for lebensraum, and considered Slavs as terrible, a race to be exterminated, but, since this is an obvious fact in the West, the Western allies rewarded and honoured Germans who killed Slavs. Quite recently, Canada gave an elderly Nazi a standing ovation for his valuable contribution killing Slavs during WWII, fighting with Canada against the USSR.

But what to do with the survivors in the West European concentration camps? The US said, 'Send them all to Palestine,' and that was done. Well armed, they started killing Philistines, who were advised by the Arabs to flee Palestine until the Jews could be killed by the Arab armies. Only the Arab armies lost. The Philistines who fled Palestine was never allowed to return, and no one knows what to do with them. Most are still in refugee camps, not citizens of any state.

The Jews forced into Palestine want the whole state, but it's not quite Apartheid. The South Africans would not let anyone with a drop of Asian or African blood to become a citizen, but a European Jew was considered European, and was welcomed as a citizen. Israel made 2 million Palestinians legal to stay in Palestine, something South Africa under Apartheid would never have done. But the rest of the Palestinians, about 5.5 million, are illegal aliens.

Israel have said that the events of 7 October 2023 mean those 5.5 million must be removed, one way or the other. If some other country will take them, Israel will send them. If not, they must be killed. So far, Israel has only killed about 26,000 Philistines in  Ghaza, but they have a strict limit of two trucks of food a day, so more than a million Philistines are in danger of death from starvation. Since the Ghaza have no guards inside the Ghaza (there are three batallions of Israeli soldiers outside the Ghaza, guarding that no Ghazan gets out) so if epidemics spread inside Ghaza, they should not infect the Jews outside the Ghaza. And no one seems to care, if no country will take them in, the rest of the world have no objection if Israel kill all the Philistines.

Of course, one question is, 'Why ship all the European and UK Jews to Palestine in the first place? Wasn't that wrong? Didn't Palestine belong to the Palestinians?'

And then, after the US sent all the Western European Jews to Palestine, many Muslim countries punished the Jews living there for something they had nothing to do with, so they fled to Israel since no other place would take them.And after the USSR collapsed, so did the economy, and many former USSR and Warsaw Pact Jews went to Israel.

But now, after more than 70 years, Morocco says they'll be glad to take back all the Jews they evicted in 1948. That's a start. Most of the European Jews in Israel have two passports, so they could leave. No one wants the Philistines, so why not let the Jews go back where they came from and let the Philistines stay in Palestine?

But the Israeli Jews have the full power of the US military behind them, and no one seems to care if they exterminate 5.5 million Philistines, and no one seems to want those 5.5 million Philistines, so it is looking like Israel will starve at least two million to death. And then they'll think about the best way to get rid of the remaining 3.5 million. And the world figures that's OK.

Or at least the world leaders all figure that's all for the best. The world has a lot of people protesting, saying what Israel is doing is wrong, saying their country should help the Palestinians, but their leaders know it's best to close their double-pane windows and drapes so they can't see or hear those protests.

Monday, January 22, 2024

New, Clear Fizz-on

Iran has been less than a month away from a nuke for more than 20 years now.

But the secret has been out since 1945.

It started in 1942 when the US put together the Chicago Pile, reported in newspapers across the world. The Chicago Pile was 60 tonnes of uranium. Most of that was uranium oxide, but about 15% was metallic uranium. Uranium naturally oxidises, so it is usually found as the oxide, which is yellow, and so is called yellowcake. It is easy enough to refine the metal from the oxide, but, as calculated by the scientists who put together the Chicago Pile, this was not necessary for the whole pile.

And, when they put the pile together, Bingo! they had a chain reaction: the pile got hot. So they put in the dampers that stopped the chain reaction. All this got well reported, then it all disappeared under a cloak of Top Secrecy. Everyone and everything was secretly moved to several places, among them Los Alamos, New Mexico which appeared on no maps.

One of my high school professors said he'd spent WWII separating U235 from the rest of the uranium, which was U238, and this was the key to creating the atomic bombs dropped on Japan. Of course, his actual work was Top Secret, so I have no idea what he really did.

After the US nuked Japan, they said they'd used bombs made from U235, and the big effort was separating out the U235 by fluorinating all the uranium then centrifuging the uranium fluoride gas until the U235 was separated out, and this had taken 3 years.

I remember a Walt Disney cartoon book where they had a tiny speck of U235; and the scientist tossed it into a great canyon. Someone said, 'Nothing happened,' and the scientist replied, 'It hasn't hit bottom yet.' When the tiny speck finally did hit bottom, there was a huge explosion that filled the entire canyon.

However, since 1945, no one else has managed to get a critical mass of U235 by fluorinating and centrifuging uranium. And then it turned out that the US finally admitted that only one bomb was U235, the other was plutonium.

Basically, if one has 60 tonnes of uranium one can easily cause a chain reaction (the pile has to be sculptured correctly, and plates of other substances have to be placed correctly), and if one lets the chain reaction continue for three years, one gets several critical masses of plutonium, which is easily separated and made into nukes. But the plutonium was the Top Secret bit, the US hoped everyone would waste time on fluorinating and centrifuging uranium.

But the USSR knew about the Chicago pile, which was public, and they knew what it was for, but in 1942, they had no idea if it would work. In 1945, they did know, so they built a 60 tonne pile of uranium and in 1949, the USSR had a nuke. For which two Jews were executed by the US for giving the USSR the secret that wasn't really a secret.

Iran do not have 60 tonnes of uranium, so they cannot create that chain reaction that produces plutonium, hence they are fluorinating and centrifuging uranium. And have been less than a month from a nuke for 20 years.

Basically, everyone who wanted a nuke and had 60 tonnes of uranium has a nuke. Everyone who has 60 tonnes (or more) of uranium and does not have a nuke does not want a nuke. And everyone who wants a nuke and does not have one does not have access to 60 tonnes of uranium.

It is said (and Israel wants everyone to believe) that they hijacked a ship with 100 tonnes of uranium on board. The owners of the ship never said anything, and one can certainly imagine why they did not. But did this really happen? Do Israel really have 100 or so nukes?

In any case, Israel (and Fox News) want a US invasion of Iran, regime change, and permanent prevention of any nuclear labs of any kind anywhere in Iran.

Not clear if those really in charge of the US military will order that invasion of Iran, or how such an invasion will go.

Friday, January 19, 2024

My father and me

When my father was the age I am now, when he read the newspaper, he knew he'd seen it all before. He was 20 years younger when the US put a couple of men on the moon, so that was old, and new attempts to do stuff in space were all old (and not that impressive). The new wars were like wars he'd seen before, and likewise the inflation, the recessions, & etc..

Now, when I read the newspapers, I don't recognise anything.

After WWII, the US produced more than 50% of World GDP. The animated short film, "Meet King Joe", made in 1949, was about the typical US factory worker. The film starts with the question: "Doesn't the factory owner get $millions while the worker gets wages that are barely enough to live on?" The answer (back then) was, 'NO!' The factory worker with all the machines was immensely productive, so he earned quite a large salary, 100 times as much as a Chinese coolie. That was then, when taxes on income more than 5 times the average US income were 91%; with state income taxes (and most business headquarters were in places like New York with 10% state income tax on incomes more than 5 times the average) amounted to 101%, so management could not pay themselves more than 5 times the average US income, so a lot of "King Joe's" production went to "King Joe". The Chinese coolie did everything manually, so he was only 1% as productive as "King Joe" and only earned 1% as much.

That was 1949. Now, rich Americans earn thousands, maybe tens of thousands, of times as much as average Americans. And most workers are not factory workers with their productivity multiplied hundreds of times by the machines they operate, so they don't produce that much, and the rich get most of what they produce.

Back in 1970, the top GDP countries were the US, then the USSR, then Japan, Germany, France, the UK, Italy, and Canada. The USSR didn't associate nor trade much with the West, and the other 7 countries formed the G7 with most of the world's GDP.

The typical Chinese person dreamed of a bicycle, but knew that dream would probably never come true. The US produced some oil, but almost every adult American had a car, so the US bought much of the oil the Middle East could produce. China had few cars, didn't need much oil, couldn't afford much oil, and so had little impact on the oil market.

Saudi and the US were firmly locked in a strategic embrace: the US desperately needed Saudi oil, and Saudi desperately needed US cash and protection.

When the Ayatollah took over Iran, the US imposed a strict blockade, and the Iranian economy fell by more than 50%. No one dared buy Iranian oil in violation of the US blockade. The US could shoot down an Iranian airliner with more than 2000 passengers and Iran could do nothing.

That was then.

Today, most Chinese have cars. The PRC are the biggest oil importer in the world (and Bharat/India now have enough cars to be a major oil consumer, but nothing like the PRC).

So, in 2021, a huge fleet of oil tankers and some destroyers arrived at the Iranian oil port and loaded with Iranian oil, then, protected by the PLAN, all the oil tankers made it back to the PRC. The Iranian economy has grown rapidly since 2021.

The three biggest economies by GDP are now: 1) the PRC; 2) the US; and 3) Bharat.

So when the PRC went to Saudi and Iran and said, 'Make peace,' both meekly said,'Yes, sir.'

And after I saw the US do all it could to avoid WWIII, now I see the US doing everything it can to start WWIII to preserve US hegemony.

It's a world I've never seen before, and I'm not sure if it's better or worse (of course, if the US starts WWIII, that'll be a lot worse than anything I've ever seen).