Zionists and Zionism

 

The words ‘Zionist’ and ‘Zionism’ are attributed to a Jew writing in the late 19^th century. The concept, without the name, appeared in writing by British Christians, staring with the Rev. Dr. Keith, in the early 19^th century, when he said that Israel/Palestine/Syria was ‘A land without a people for a people without a land.’ What is now Israel was part of the Ottoman Vilayet of Syria. Today, most Zionists are Christians who ‘know’ that Jesus cannot return until all the Jews are in Palestine, so they want Israel to continue to exist and every Jew to be sent there. Only a minority of Zionists are Jews, and only a minority of Jews are Zionists, most are happy living outside Israel, and, while they might visit, have no desire to move there and become Israeli citizens. Or they might become dual citizens so they can easily visit Israel and just as easily return to the country they consider home.

After the fall of the Ottoman Empire at the end of WWI, most of the Asian and African Ottoman Empire became French and British colonies. The Ottoman Vilayets were all broken up and the pieces shared between the British and the French. Britain called one of their colonies ‘Palestine’, which had once been a small part of the Vilayet of Syria, and the British Balfour Declaration said that Palestine was for the Jews, but they didn’t really mean that: the Jews in the Pale were subject to pogroms and wanted to go to Palestine, but were denied, and Hitler was refused permission to ship German Jews to Palestine, the British meant Palestine as a place to which they wanted every Jew in the UK to go, since the Anglicans believed it was wrong for the UK to host Jews. For one thing, some of the Anglican clergy consider all Jews to be deicides, and for another, Palestine is in the Fertile Crescent, so British Jews shipped to Palestine/Israel could farm using advanced British agricultural equipment and produce lots of food with limited human labour that could be sold very cheaply to the UK while making the Jews from Britain moderately wealthy by British standards and quite rich by Palestinian standards. Plus, Palestine could produce lots of tropical fruits and vegetables to tempt the British palates.

The British had mixed opinions about what to do about the Arabs living in Palestine. Some said that they were Arabs, so nomads who wandered, spending part of their time wandering through Palestine, but no problem if they were told to keep their wanderings out of Palestine which was for the Jews; but other Brits said that the Jews and the Philistines, native inhabitants of Palestine since before the first Jew ever came there according to the book of Samuel, should live together in peace, with nothing taken from the Philistines: the Jews would live in the parts of Palestine that were undeveloped, without any Philistines, or they would buy their land from Philistine owners who wanted to sell (coming from the UK they’d have enough money that lots of Philistine and Ottoman owners would want to sell).

A small number of British Jews went to British Palestine as colonists after WWI, and started rebelling, trying to evict the British Imperialists, but without success.

Then came WWII and the Holocaust. The US refused to allow Jews to immigrate, except for the equivalent of Nobel Prize winners, until 1944, when they had heard about the Nazi persecution of the Jews and said any Jew who could make it to the US would be admitted as a refugee. Many European Jews had been turned away by the US before 1944, and were sent back to Europe to be murdered by the Nazis. And the UK refused to let Hitler send any European Jews to British Palestine, since the British Jews who had gone there were already a problem for the British governing Palestine, one that would only become worse if a lot of European Jews were allowed to join them.

(Note that a lot of the Jews killed in the Holocaust could have been saved had the US and the UK not refused to let them leave Europe.)

After WWII, those who had killed or helped to kill Jews were punished severely. If one reads the book, My Struggle, written by Hitler in the ‘20s, it says the Jews were all terrible and Europe must be cleansed of the Jews, a horrible statement, so many say the book must be banned, while others say it should be studied to ensure that it never happens again. The book also says that the Slavs are all terrible and Europe must be cleansed of all Slavs, but this is considered by the US and UK as a simple statement of fact, not worth mentioning. Those who had killed or helped kill Slavs and made it west of the Warsaw Pact were generally rewarded, and given good jobs working for the US or UK. We recently saw Canada bestow great honours on an elderly member of the Waffen-SS for his work killing Slavs in WWII.

After WWII, the Allies discovered that somewhere between 4.5 – 6 million Jews had been murdered by the Nazis, and 2 million or so were still alive in the concentration camps, or had somehow managed to evade the Nazis. The US announced that all would be sent to British Palestine, while the old, European empires would all be dissolved, so Palestine would no longer be a British colony but an independent state. Actually, Palestine had once included the Transjordan, and an early version of the Mandate said all was for the Jews, but then the Transjordan was set aside for Arabs. The Jews were told they must settle with the Philistines between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean. The Jews had better weapons than the Arabs, and went to war to take all of Palestine for the revived state of Israel, but the US insisted on a truce when Ghaza and the West Bank were still held by Arabs, so the nation of Israel was originally everything controlled by the Jews when the US ordered the ceasefire in 1948. The Ghaza became part of Egypt and the West Bank became part of Jordan.

 This lasted until 1967 when Israel started by destroying all the Arab air forces, then, with total air superiority, they annexed Ghaza and the West Bank and parts of Syria, Lebanon, and other parts of Egypt beyond Ghaza.

 This lasted until 1973 when Egypt got back most of Israeli Egypt for a few days, thanks to Soviet Air Defences, but then the Egyptians did not defend their air defence system, so Israel captured and destroyed it, after which, with total air superiority, Israel recaptured all of Egypt north of the Nile, but then the US made Israel give Egypt back all of the Sinai in exchange for a peace treaty. Jordan also signed a peace treaty, and got peace and everything that had been in the British colony east of the Jordan River. Israel still have chunks of Syria and Lebanon and no intention of giving any of it back. Israel also have all of Ghaza and the West Bank.

Israel is called an Apartheid State, but this is wrong. The word ‘apartheid’ comes from South Africa, where no one with a drop of African or Asian blood could be a citizen (Jews from Europe were considered European, so they could and did become citizens if they moved to South Africa and applied for citizenship). Israel say that two million Philistines are Israeli citizens, and another half million to one million non-Jews and non-Philistines are also citizens, but seven million, the overwhelming majority of the ten million Israeli citizens, must have a Jewish connection.

Strict, Orthodox Judaism says one is only Jewish if one’s mother was Jewish, but Israel says anyone with a Jewish grandparent qualifies for citizenship based on Jewish heritage. This was based on the Holocaust, where the Nazis said proof that one grandparent was Jewish was grounds for being sent to a Concentration Camp. Strict Orthodox Jews say that many Israelis who are citizens by virtue of having a Jewish grandparent are not actually Jewish unless their mother was Jewish.

All information in Israel is strictly controlled by the government, so it is hard to know what is true. It is said that most Israeli citizens: the 7 million Jews, the 2 million Philistines, and the million other citizens want everything from the Jordan to the Mediterranean, and are happy with Israel running the way it is currently being run. They figure the Philistines who do not have Israeli passports are all Antisemites who want to kill all the Jews, and probably all the Israeli citizens, so they’d like all the Philistines who do not have passports evicted.

Israel figure all the Philistines who do not have Israeli passports are illegal aliens who have no right to be in Israel, and want them all to go elsewhere. After the 7 October attack, Israel plan to remove every last Philistine from Ghaza, one way or the other: if other nations will accept them, those who have never been part of Hamas will be sent there. If no other nation will accept them, then all must be killed, but their deaths are not Israel’s fault, their deaths are entirely the fault of the nations that refused to accept them.

As the British said 200 years ago, those Philistines are Arabs, and belong in some Arab country, while Israel must be for the Jews, partly for the cheap crops they can produce and sell to the UK, and partly so that, when every Jew is in Palestine, Jesus can return.

Of course, that was 200 years ago, and now most Christian Zionists are in the US, and they vote, so the US strongly support Zionists and Zionism. And with the full support of the US, if Israel want to kill every Palestinian in Ghaza, or, for that matter, every Palestinian in Israel who does not have an Israeli passport, the US will back them 100%.

Truth in Ghaza???

Three Israeli hostages somehow got freed. Did they escape? Were they released by Hamas? We don't know. What we do know is that they came out shirtless, so obviously unarmed, and shouted in Hebrew, 'We are Israeli hostages!' and the Israeli Occupation Forces (IOF) shot and killed them all.

Israel say they are interested in saving all hostages, that they so love life (and, by 'life' they mean Israeli life) that they will do anything to save Israeli hostages. But Israeli actions show they only want a Ghaza that is Philistine Free, they are saturation bombing, all possible dwellings destroyed, no food, water, fuel, or medical supplies allowed into Ghaza, so the Philistines in Ghaza are starving, drinking polluted water, being bombed and shelled by IOF tanks, more than 21,000 killed so far, death from communicable diseases is increasing rapidly.

Israel (and those who favour Israel) say the counts of Philistine deaths come from Hamas, and so one must not believe the Philistine lies that 21,000, mostly women and children have been killed: the strikes have been surgical, hitting Hamas positions with many Hamas fighters shooting rockets at Israeli cities, but these Hamas terrorists keep some women and children captive with them as human shields, and, to stop the terrorists' rocket fire from killing many innocent civilians, the Hamas military units must be taken out, along with their human shields, so every woman and child killed by the IOF was forced by Hamas.

This war has been difficult for the IOF, they have lost 155 members.

Is any of the above true?

Israel seems to be on the Hannibal Principle: Israelis should die, by their own hand if necessary, to prevent their becoming hostages, since hostages cost Israel far too much. So the three IOF members who were taken hostage were killed for allowing themselves to be taken hostage.

The pause was because the war was not going well for Israel, so Israel asked for and got a ceasefire, demanded hostages, and Hamas released 100 hostages.

During the week long ceasefire, the IOF revised strategy and tactics to reduce IOF losses, and, when ready, ended the ceasefire.

Alastair Crooke estimates that more than 1,000 members of the IOF have been killed, hence the first demand for a ceasefire from Hamas, and now a second demand that Hamas has refused since Israel will not meet their conditions. Again, IOF losses are excessive, far more than the 155 to which Israel admit, so Israel want another week's ceasefire to regroup, study, and revise strategy and tactics, and Hamas are not willing to give them that week.

Israel have done huge damage to the Philistine civilians, not so much to Hamas who continue to blow up IOF tanks and kill IOF servicepersons.

Fox and many other news outlets repeat that Hamas are terrorists who must be neutralised, and all civilian deaths are entirely the fault of Hamas, and we must not believe Hamas counts of civilian deaths in Ghaza.

CNN, after 7 weeks of repeating the official Israeli story, not being allowed into Ghaza, were finally allowed in and reported on the many injured children and the fact that every building they saw had been destroyed so the Ghazans have nowhere to live, they are crowded into shelters which make it easy for the IOF to find and bomb them, and they have nothing to eat or drink. CNN were only allowed to see one field hospital set up by the UAE, the only hospital in all Ghaza not being bombed. And the reporter looked shocked at what she saw.

Israel make it clear that they will not allow a single Philistine to remain in Ghaza: if other nations will take the women, children, and elderly men, Israel will let them go/deport them. If not, Israel have no choice but to kill every Philistine, but don't blame Israel, blame the other nations who refuse to take the women and children in Ghaza.

And after Ghaza is cleansed, the West Bank will become a priority.

Meanwhile, the Yemen managed to disrupt shipping through the Red Sea for a week, but now the US say the US Navy will protect ships, and shipping has resumed.

The question of how much the Yemen and Iran can disrupt supplies going to Israel remains open for now.

Beginnings of a change????

I once had almost every news channel on satellite, but then, in February 2022, the EU demanded that all EU-based satellites remove the Russian news channels. Still, I could get Qatar, Iran, and the PRC. Until 12 December 2022, when the EU denounced all non-EU/US news and said all must be banned.

I get a few news channels now, the ones fully approved by the government where I live, the government that provides all telephone and TV services. So, for reasons that escape me, I get BBC, CNN, Euronews, I24, and France24 for free (plus the local news channel, which is only local news). Nothing from Qatar or Iran, and only the PRC Arabic channel (I get all the other channels in Arabic, but I only understand English, so I'd say I don't get PRC, and that's almost but not quite true).

The biggest change is CNN. Last week, they had a report from Ghaza, their first. Before, all their news was the official Israel/US news from the US/Israeli spokespersons: every Palestinian is a rabid Antisemite who wants to kill every Jew in Palestine, so Israel is strictly acting in self-defence, and every civilian death was because a Hamas military unit held some civilian human shields captive as they tried their best to kill Jews, and when the Israeli Occupation Force (IOF) returned fire, all those civilian deaths were entirely the fault of Hamas.

But then CNN was granted access to the UAE Field Hospital in Ghaza for the very first time, their first time in the Ghaza since 7 October, and CNN saw nothing but injured children (the UAE prioritises children). The UAE Field Hospital only has about 100 beds, while every other hospital in the Ghaza has been bombed. In many hospitals, all the staff were arrested as agents supporting the Hamas Antisemites in their goal of killing Jews. Israel say that every hospital in the Ghaza, except the UAE Field Hospital, is not a hospital but a Hamas military base disguised as a hospital, so a legitimate military target, and the US say they have verified that the Israeli statement is strictly factual.

CNN now say that the UAE Field Hospital is treating lots of children with war wounds, and is getting more children from other hospitals that are overcrowded, badly damaged, and without any medical supplies. The CNN reporter had a hard time blaming all the children, badly injured by Israeli bombs supplied by the US, on Hamas.

I was shocked, since before last week CNN just parroted the official US/Israeli line.

Driving through Ghaza to and from the hospital, CNN saw the massive damage: almost every building in the Ghaza destroyed, totally unsuitable for anyone to live in. The CNN reporter sounded totally shocked by what she saw, and she no longer seems to accept the official Israeli/US version.

I can also get Fox if I pay for it, and Fox remains with the official line: Hamas are all terrorist Antisemitic Nazis who intend to kill every Jew in Palestine, the line repeated by both Israel and the US; 7 October was a day when Hamas brutally murdered 1,200 innocent Jews who posed no threat, raping and murdering many women and children, beheading many children and burning many children in the ovens in their homes while their parents had to listen to them scream.

Of course, the Grayzone have ample evidence that the official US/Israeli version is completely false.

CNN have now stopped reiterating the official US/Israeli version. They haven't quite gone as far as to broadcast the Grayzone version, but at least they admit that Israel are bombing civilians and killing many children, and have destroyed just about every home in Ghaza leaving the Philistines in the Ghaza with nowhere to live. At least it's a start.

Are Hamas Nazi Antisemites?

The Israeli government keep telling us that they were at peace with Hamas. That the Jews came to Israel in peace, but were viciously attacked by the Arabs. Again and again, Israel offered the Arabs peace, and again and again, the Arabs attacked.

And now Hamas are determined to kill every last Jew in Palestine for starters, and, having killed every Jew in Palestine, they'll go after the Jews in neighbouring countries. And then they'll try to kill every last Jew in the world. And the Jews have never done anything to Hamas, Hamas are just rabid Antisemites who want to kill every Jew in the world.

Good story, strongly supported by the US, but not accepted anywhere except the US and Israel.

The Bible tells us the ancestors of the Jews were in Ur when G_d ordered them to go to Palestine, which was full of Philistines. The first letter of the Hebrew word was transliterated as φ (Phi) by the Greeks and P by the Romans. So the Hebrew word can be transliterated as Philistine or Palestine (Hebrew doesn't write the vowels). In the book of Samuel, G_d condemned Saul for killing thousands of Philistines, while David was praised for killing tens of thousands. So the land belonged to the Philistines before G_d gave it to the Jews.

In the New Testament, a Jewish boy leaves home, squanders all his money, and has to take a job at a piggery. Since no Jew would ever run a piggery, the owner must have been a goyim. So Palestine in the New Testament had a lot of Jews and a lot of goyim.

After 7 October 2023, a lot of the Jews in Israel were convinced that they need a land that has no goyim at all. So their goal is to get rid of all the Philistines, one way or another. If some other nations would take them all, all the women and children and elderly men could leave. If not, they all must be killed: most Israelis believe that all the Ghazans want to kill every Jew in Israel, so it is self defence, it is the only way for the Jews to stay alive.

The US say they have verified that everything the Israeli government say is true: the Ghaza have no hospitals, no schools, no churches, no mosques, all are Hamas military facilities disguised as hospitals, schools, churches, and mosques, so all are legitimate military targets. It is just self defence to bomb all the homes, all the refugee camps, all these people want to kill every Jew, so what else can Israel do?

Of course, only the US and Israel identify all the Philistines as Nazi Antisemites determined to exterminate all the Jews in Israel/the world, leaving all the Jews in mortal danger until they remove every last Philistine from Israel/Palestine. Most other countries think the Philistines would be happy to live in peace with the Jews if everyone had equal rights.

Israel kept Ghaza surrounded by a high wall and three battalions of Israeli troops. Food was limited. Fishing was limited. Water was limited. There was barely enough to keep the 2 million Ghazans alive. So Hamas tried to kidnap some Israelis to get Israel to make some concessions.

Israel ordered the battalions guarding Ghaza to stand down. Israel were warned by some Israeli Occupation Force (IOF) scouts that Hamas were coming. Israel ignored the warning for about an hour.

Then the IOF arrived and applied the Hannibal Principle: no Israelis should ever allow themselves to be taken hostage, they must fight to the death. So the IOF shot at hostage takers and hostages. They shot Hellfire missiles at villas and compounds where they knew Hamas were inside, killing Hamas and their hostages. Then the IOF reported that Hamas had burned many Israelis to death, roasted babies in ovens while their parents heard them screaming, when it was IOF Hellfire missiles that burned those babies.

And then, for two months, Israel attacked Ghaza, first bombing, then sending in the IOF ground forces to find and kill all members of Hamas. The ground attack did not go as well as hoped. The Hamas spokesperson who calls himself Abu Obeida and who may be seen on Rumble (he's banned by Alphabet and Meta) reports hundreds of IOF tanks destroyed. So Israel called for a week's ceasefire if Hamas would release hostages.

The families of the hostages had been demanding that the government negotiate for the hostages, but this is not a priority for the Israeli government. But the Israeli government demanded that Hamas release at least 10 women and children hostages a day for the ceasefire to continue, and, after a week when the IOF had reviewed tactics and strategy and were ready to resume attacking Hamas, the ceasefire ended, but at least Israel had convinced Hamas to release 100 hostages, placating the families of the released hostages.

As the IOF ran over Ghaza, three IOF hostages came out, obviously unarmed, speaking Hebrew saying, 'We are IOF hostages,' and the IOF were ordered to kill them all, since they should never have surrendered, they should have fought to the death instead of allowing Hamas to take them hostages. The Israeli government have no interest in recovering the hostages, they just want Hamas exterminated and every Philistine in the Ghaza deported to some other country, or, if no other country will take them, killed, since the official Israeli position is that all the Ghazan Philistines want to kill every Jew in Israel, so it is not possible to allow even a single Ghazan Philistine to remain in Israel.

But now Abu Obeida reports losses by the IOF, and the IOF have asked for another week's ceasefire, meaning the IOF want a week to revise tactics and strategy since their campaign against Hamas is not going as well as they'd like.

But, so far, Hamas have refused another week's ceasefire. Clearly Hamas are being unreasonable refusing the week-long ceasefire because they want nothing but war with Israel, nothing but to kill every last Jew in Israel.

So Israel will continue to kill all those baby terrorists before they can grow up to be big terrorists. What else can they do? And anyone who questions Israel is a rabid Antisemite.

Truth, what does that mean?

 Israel admit that 115 Israeli soldiers fighting in the Ghaza have been killed, and this number is in all the mainstream media. But is it real? Probably not: Israel has shown that it is not interested in rescuing any hostages, Israel has shown they believe in the Hannibal Principle: never let any hostage be taken, if there is no other way, kill the hostage and as many of the hostage takers as possible. When three Israeli hostages managed to get free, the Israeli Occupation Force (IOF) killed all three, even though they were shouting, in Hebrew, that they were freed hostages.

The break 'to free hostages' seems to have been because the war was not going well, and Israel wanted a week-long ceasefire to review and revise their strategy and tactics.

One can find Abu Obeida on Rumble, showing many Israeli tanks being destroyed in Ghaza. Google searches are useless, Alphabet do not support finding Abu Obeida videos. Google can find sites that say 'Don't believe anything Abu Obeida posts!' But Rumble has some very realistic looking videos that claim they are proof that many IOF tanks have been destroyed.

And the week-long ceasefire fits with the war going badly and the IOF needing a break, and they used the break to get about 90 women and children hostages freed, but the IOF have shown that they are not interested in getting back hostages alive, but since they needed a break, why not use the break to get back as many hostages as possible without having to do much in return?

The New York Times vs The Grayzone

 The New York Times of 13 December had an editorial column by Jill Filipovic, "Confront the Evidence of Sexual Violence on Oct. 7. The Horrors of This War Are Not Either/Or."

Basically, it is taken as proven fact that the Hamas terrorists raped many women and murdered many women and children on 7 October 2023. But The Grayzone say that those 'rapes' and many of those children's deaths were all manufactured by two Israeli government offices for spreading disinformation, ZAKA and United Hatzalah. The article focuses on claims by ZAKA and provides rather convincing evidence that all are false.

However,our reliable establishment media all reiterate those crimes of Hamas are all true and Israel have no choice but to exterminate all of Hamas, and if that means Israel must kill everyone in Ghaza, they have every right to self defence.

Or we can blame other Arab countries for not accepting all the women and children in Ghaza, but we cannot blame Israel for their deaths.

What Is Really Going on in Ghaza????

We had a few brief videos of hostages being handed over to the Red Cross by armed Hamas guards, and the hostages shook hands with the Hamas guards and those hostages who spoke said they were well treated. We got another very brief video as the hostages were transferred from the Red Cross to Israeli teams. Then the hostages disappeared in Israeli hospitals, incommunicado. When they emerged, they either refused to say anything or said they had been brutalised by Hamas. It is understood that all hostages had to sign an agreement not to say anything of which the Israeli government would not approve.

So were they well treated or brutalised? No idea.

Meanwhile, Abu Obeida has videos showing Israeli tanks being blown up, and Hamas claim to have killed more than 1,000 members of the Israeli Occupation Force (IOF), while Israel say they have lost about 100 soldiers killed by the Hamas terrorists, but have killed hundreds of members of the senior Hamas leadership. So which is true? No idea.

There is a strange video distributed by Israel showing some captured Hamas militants, stripped to their underwear, forced to hand over their weapons. Many ask, 'You made them take off all their clothing but keep their guns, then, after they stripped, you made them hand over their guns????? This makes absolutely no sense.' So is the video a real video showing a group of senior Hamas terrorists captured, stripped to their underwear, then forced to hand over all their weapons, or is it all a staged video with no relation to the reality on the ground? No idea.

Israel say they had a decisive victory over Hezbollah in 2006, and would like a quick repeat to take Hezbollah completely and permanently out of action, but the US refused permission, saying they do not want the cleansing of the Ghaza to spread to a regional conflict, so, for now, Israel's hands are tied. Other versions are that Israel lost badly in 2006, and Hamas could do extensive damage if a full-scale conflict broke out, so both Israel and the US are hoping the conflict between Israel and Hezbollah will remain at a low level, a few rockets fired by Hezbollah doing little damage to Israel, a few Israeli bombing runs doing little damage to Hezbollah. So which is it? Again, no idea.

The one thing that is clear is that anyone in the US or UK who speaks out against the Israeli cleansing of Ghaza to remove all the Philistines, either by their removal to some other country or killed—Israel, the US, and UK don't really care which—is a heinous Antisemite who must be fired from any job they might have, and many who spoke out against Israel's self-defence actions in Ghaza have been removed from their jobs and all media, both mainstream and social, have been banned from carrying any such Antisemitic ideas. In the US and UK, everyone must fully support Israel's actions in the Ghaza. Or else.

The Horrendous Crimes of ????

 The MSM news I've been watching say the Hamas attack on 7 October involved rapes of just about every captured female (and some males) followed by murder of many of them, an attack that must be condemned, and all must hope flooding the tunnels with ocean water will finally give those Hamas captors the treatment they deserve. (They don't expect to get any more hostages back, the price of the women and children was far too high, and many think it should not have been paid. In any case, the ocean water should eliminate all the remaining hostages and the Hamas leadership, so no further price need be paid by Israel to get any more hostages back.)

Only The Grayzone says those rapes, those babies burned in ovens while their parents had to listen to them screaming, were all lies created by some Israeli experts in lying about Philistine atrocities. One of the Hamas 'rape victims' was a Kurdish woman raped and killed several years ago.

So whom should we believe? The Israel Occupation Force (IOF) spokespersons, as all the MSM say we must, or The Grayzone, who have a record of reliable reporting and videos that support their stories?

Ramzy Baroud and Romana Rubeo Have an Interesting View

 In Ghaza, there are two main versions of what is happening: West and non-West.

In the Western media, Hamas are all antiSemitic terrorists who are determined to kill every last Israeli, so anyone who is not a fanatical antiSemite knows Israel must exterminate Hamas, and if that means killing every last Philistine in the Ghaza, Israel have no choice but to do so if they do not wish to have Hamas kill every last Jew in Israel. And anyone who does not fully support Israel in everything is an antiSemite who makes Adolph look like a peacenik. Fortunately, Israel are winning. If the Arabs do not want to see Israel kill every last Philistine in the Ghaza, they must agree to take the women and children, since not one Philistine can be left alive in the Ghaza or that one Philistine might annihilate all the Jews, and anyone who suggests that Israel leave even one Philistine in the Ghaza is a rabid antiSemite.

In the Eastern media, e.g., in the writings of Ramzy Baroud and Romana Rubeo, one gets a different perspective. Not only are the Philistines acting in self defence, they are winning. Mr Baroud and Ms Rubeo suggest one follow "Abu Obeida and Abu Hamza, military spokesmen for the Al-Qassam Brigades and the Al-Quds Brigades respectively". They say  Abu Obeida and Abu Hamza "provide very careful accounts of the nature of the battle and the losses of advancing Israeli military forces in their regular, much-anticipated statements."

They write, "And, while Abu Obeida’s statements are almost always followed by well-produced videos, documenting the systematic destruction of Israeli tanks, no such documentation substantiates Israeli military claims." 

Naturally, I tried to look up Abu Obeida’s statements and found he was on Twitter, now X, but his account has been suspended for being antiSemitic. So I'm not sure where one can find Abu Obeida's postings, and, if I posted a link, I'm sure it would soon be deleted.

I heard one Saudi say, 'But we Arabs are also Semites, so how can we be antiSemitic?'

Of course, Israel say those Jews who do not fully support Israel are antiSemitic Jews, so Israel assume most Arabs are antiSemitic.

Still, the claim that Israel are winning easily in Ghaza, that they have killed 15,000 Hamas terrorists and very few, if any, innocent civilians, does seem to be rather convincingly disproven by Abu Obeida's postings (if one can find them).