Telegram

Pavel Durov set up a website in Russia where Russians could complain about Putin's government. He was ordered to stop, so he left Russia. France immediately offered him French citizenship for doing the Right Thing and setting up a website to complain about Russia, getting threatened by the Russian government, then leaving Russia so he could keep a website to complain about Russia, and Durov accepted since he loves French cuisine. He abandoned his original anti-Russian website and set up Telegram, which was also anti-Russian. He was lauded by the US, UK, France, the EU, etc.

But then Telegram grew and grew, and now has about one billion users (and is probably still growing). And the Russian government and military started using Telegram.

France had a huge part of Africa colonised before WWII, but then the US made France 'liberate' all their colonies, meaning, make those former French colonies into French neo-colonies.

The US has been the world leader in neocolonialism since 1823. The European Imperialists sent their armies to conquer a country, then the top government officials were all Europeans. The Head of State was the European Head of State. The resident Head of State was a European governor or viceroy. All senior government officials were European.

The US had an agent give money and weapons to a small group of local citizens in the country they wanted to neo-colonise, and those local citizens took over the country and formed the government. The US agent made it clear that the new government must do whatever the US ordered them to do or they would be replaced. The local leaders, helped into their positions by the US, got paid very well, but most of the country's resources went to US corporations at minuscule prices, and most of the population were impoverished, while US corporations made huge profits.

After WWII, the US forced France to 'liberate' all their former colonies and make them into neo-colonies. Now locals are the government instead of French citizens, but they must do whatever France tell them to do or be replaced, and French profits are as much or more than they had been when the neo-colonies had been colonies.

Until about a year ago. Russia, probably using Telegram, provided assistance and about half the French African neo-colonies rebelled and ejected all the French troops and 'advisors'. And all their natural resources are now being sold by the countries at world market prices with all the profits going to the former neo-colony. France are furious, and blame Russia and Telegram.

So France has planned since February, 2024, to arrest Pavel Durov; however, Durov is a billionaire who probably had access to French arrest warrants, so the plans were Top Secret. When Durov's plane called a French airport to say Durov was coming to France, the airport called the police, the government issued a warrant for Durov's arrest, and he was arrested as soon as his plane landed.

I like Telegram because of the news. They have national news from the US/UK/EU, but also news that is not US/UK/EU.

The news is basically the same on CNN, BBC, France24, DW, Euronews, and all the US/UK/EU news media: Russia, hoping to rebuild the Soviet Union, launched a totally unprovoked attack on the Ukraine, planning to dominate the country that hated the Soviet Union, and wanted to keep the Russians out. Fortunately, NATO gave the Ukraine modern, advanced weapons, while Russia only have outmoded Soviet weapons from WWII, or maybe Czarist weapons from WWI. So the entire first Russian army was completely destroyed in just a few weeks by the Ukrainian Army, who can't possibly be Nazis since they have a Jewish president, so the Russian propaganda is patently  ridiculous. The Russians, while they were unable to fight the Ukrainians with their advanced weapons, did go into undefended villages and murdered all the civilians, running away as the Ukrainian military approached.

After that, Putin sent a second and third Russian Army, but all were wiped out. Russia have lost more than a million troops, while the Ukraine have only lost 31,000. The Russian economy has been totally destroyed by US sanctions, Putin is barely holding onto his presidency and will soon be handed over to the Hague, while the Ukraine will not only have all the Ukraine back, but a large part of what was formerly Russia.

But on Telegram, I can read a different story, a story where Russia are winning in the Ukraine, where most of the Ukrainians who invaded Russia are dead and the Kursk Oblast will soon be totally liberated.

And France and the US both hate Durov's Telegram and want to change it back to the rabidly anti-Russian Telegram it was when it first started.

I only use Telegram to read news. But Telegram is also an encrypted communications channel with an encryption NATO have been unable to break, but breaking the encryption will be very easy with Durov a French prisoner who can't enjoy his $billions until he fully complies with US and French demands.

France intend to hand Telegram over to the US who will use it to spread pro-US/pro-French/-pro-EU/anti-Russia/anti-PRC/anti-Iran propaganda, and where they will be able to see everything every one of the billion Telegram users are posting.

Durov has been charged with child pornography. Since there is no child pornography on the public channels that carry national news from just about every nation, if there is any, it is only on the encrypted channels with unbreakable encryption (until Durov hands over the key). So there is no way France have actually seen any child pornography on Telegram, but it could be all over all those encrypted channels, so Durov is charged as a child pornographer. French justice doesn't require extraneous, irrelevant things like 'proof'.

So Durov will either break and hand Telegram over to US Intelligence or spend the rest of his life in gaol as a child pornographer.

And those Russian lies about what is happening in Russia and the Ukraine won't be visible, everyone will have to accept the official US/UK/EU version of the news as true, since there won't be any alternatives.

So France have done the world a great service by getting rid of access to any news that isn't US/UK/EU based. 

 (Mike Benz says this will also make it easier for the US DoJ and Intelligence to block any pro-Trump information, since it is vital to the US ruling classes that Trump never again get any position of power, Trump and what the Deep State call his lies must be totally blocked.)

New US President???

Before President Biden was 'persuaded' not to run for re-election, Former President Trump seemed to be almost certain to win the election. Since then, Vice-president Harris has been rising rapidly, and seems to be leading in most of the swing states. President Trump seems likely to do a bit better than in 2020 when he lost Georgia, since he is now leading in Georgia, but he is trailing in most of the other swing states and it looks very likely that he will lose to Harris.

But, ultimately, what are we likely to see?

In the Ukraine, President Trump noted that President Putin sent two letters saying Russia could not allow the Ukraine to join NATO. Putin got two replies: 'Russia have no say in the matter. NATO will incorporate the Ukraine and there is nothing Russia can do about it.' Trump says he would not have responded that way, and war would have been avoided.

Vice-president Harris has said that Russia must be completely and utterly defeated, Ukraine must regain all of the territory they had in 1991, plus the large section of Russia they will be able to annex with NATO weapons. Several Harris advisors have said that Russia must be destroyed completely, Putin must go to the Hague as a war criminal, Russia must broken up into many small, unarmed nations that can never threaten NATO in any way.

But does the US President actually have any say in anything? Twice Trump ordered all US troops out of Syria, and not one troop left.

Most US presidents read the Teleprompter. They are good actors who seem to be giving all the commands, but they read what's on the Teleprompter. Trump did not, and his refusal to read the Teleprompter and order troops into Syria had absolutely no effect on what the US military did, but it did convince the senior Civil Servants to make sure Trump is never reelected, and they did their best in 2020 and will try their best in 2024.

The people running the US will still be running the US, even in the unlikely event that Trump is re-elected. Trump might fight against the war in the Ukraine, but money and weapons will still go to Ukraine.

And, of course, Trump and Harris are 110% behind Israel, so there isn't even a chance of any complaint about the US doing everything it can to help the Israel Occupation Force (IOF) eradicate all the Palestinians in the Ghaza and the settlers eradicate all the Palestinians in the West Bank, no matter who gets elected.

***

History

The Chancellor of Germany elected in 1933 said he wanted a Judenfrei Europe, but he said during the 1920s that he wanted to deport all the Jews. The UK said that Jews were a problem, but European Jews were a European problem and must not be inflicted on any other continent, so no European Jews would be allowed in British Palestine, and the Royal Navy would prevent any attempt to deport Jews from Europe. 

The US only allowed a very few European Jews into the US: there was a law against Jewish immigration, with exceptions for people such as Nobel Laureates. One (or more) from a small selection of top scientists and museum directors had to write letters recommending that a specific Jew (e.g., Albert Einstein and Harry Kissinger's father) be admitted, but almost all were rejected.

With nowhere to deport Jews, Germany put them in Concentration Camps, but there wasn't enough food in Germany during WWII, so the Jews were starved until they began developing serious infectious diseases and infecting the Concentration Camp guards and other workers, so Germany began gassing and cremating any Jew too weak to do heavy manual labour as the only way to stop the infections.

***

Israel wants either to deport all the Palestinians, or for them to voluntarily leave Israel. Only no one will take Palestinians except Syria, where the law says any Palestinian who can make it to Syria with a valid travel document will be admitted; however, Israel does not want any Palestinians in Syria, so they are not allowed to go from Israel to Syria with a travel document.

If no other nation will take the Palestinians, Israel will kill them all, just as the Germans tried to kill all the Jews.

But Germany was at war with two or three nations with strong militaries and lost the war, so the German government that wanted to kill all the Jews was replaced with a military occupation government that saved as many Jews as they could and executed many Germans for killing Jews.

Israel is now at war with various independent groups, e.g., Hamas in Ghaza, and also with Hizbollah and Ansarallah, none of which can possibly defeat Israel.

Israel assumes that, if they can provoke Iran to strike Israel a second time, preferably a strike that does no more damage than the first Iranian strike on Israel, the US will then do their duty and totally destroy Iran.

Here, of course, is one tiny glitch: it's not clear if the US can destroy Iran, which has a much stronger military than any the US has faced recently. After a US Navy ship destroyed an Iranian passenger plane on 3 July 1988, killing 290 passengers, Iran could do nothing, but they vowed that would never happen again, and have been working for 36 years on anti-Naval weapons.

A huge US fleet is sailing toward Iran to attack if Iran attack Israel. The US have promised they will totally destroy Iran if Iran dare strike Israel. But the US have not faced an enemy like Iran. There is a very good chance that the entire fleet will be sunk, and that the Iranian strike on Israel will severely damage major government and military targets.

Germany had easily defeated Britain and France, once the strongest militaries in the world, so they thought it would be very easy to defeat the Soviet Union and the US. They were wrong.

And Israel and the US might have seriously underestimated Iran. Especially if Iran get a little help from their friends.

A US Fleet Is Sailing toward Iran to Protect Israel

 On 3 July 1988, an Iranian airliner filled with suicidal jihadis tried to destroy a US Naval vessel by flying into the vessel backwards. The photographs show the airliner had its tail pointed at the US Naval vessel, and the crew of the vessel said the airliner was flying directly at them in a suicidal jihadi attack.

Iran must have had advanced airliners designed to fly backwards so they could fly into and destroy US Naval vessels and the crew would be fooled into thinking the airliner was flying away from them. At least that's the official US Navy version of what happened. So the US Navy ship shot the airliner down, killing 290 people, men, women, and children suicidal jihadists. And Iran could do absolutely nothing.

Iran were annoyed and vowed to work on naval defence systems that would enable them so sink any US Naval vessel that attacked Iran. They've had 36 years to work on their naval defence systems.