NATO remain determined to destroy Russia (and take Russian energy sources as reparations?)

 Several leaders of NATO countries have promised large numbers of heavy weapons. And the Western media, as usual, assure us that Russia are losing about 1,000 troops a day to NATO artillery, and Putin has just about completely run out of soldiers, so regime change must be close.

Western media have repeatedly described the complete destruction of the Russian invasion force since the conflict started, and Russia have never, since 1 March, been able to hold out for more than a fortnight.

The US made it clear that all petroleum resources are US property (except for Saudi, who bought their oil property back, giving Western investors a good profit).

Mossadegh and the Shah both thought Iranian oil should be for the Iranian people, so the US removed both as Head of State. Sadly, the Shah's replacements have been even more hostile to the West than the Shah was.

And Venezuela still refuse to return all the US oil in Venezuela, and have not been convinced by the US blockade.

But surely Russia can be convinced, since all of NATO are determined to help the US break up Russia into small, harmless, independent (at least independent on Russia, they can depend on NATO if they need anything) nations, all of whose petroleum products belong to the US.

But this war on Russia does not seem to be going nearly as well as the wars on Grenada, Panama, Iraq, and Afghanistan, except in the Western media, which are read and believed by the NATO leadership, and where Russia have already been decisively defeated.