Trump: Peace Candidate, but ...

I heard 'President' Trump say, twice, 'I order all US troops out of Syria.'

Of course, the DNC and RNC each put up one candidate, each, every four years, and the Electoral College picks one of them to be the actor who plays the part of US president. But, when 'President Trump' failed to read his line on the Teleprompter, i.e., 'I order the US military into Syria to bring peace and democracy,' and instead ordered all US troops out of Syria, not one troop left. So orders the actor gives that are not on the Teleprompter do not get followed. The orders given by the person who authored the speech on the Teleprompter are the orders that are actually followed.

And, on 19 January 2025, I heard 'President-elect' Trump say, 'The US must withdraw from the Ukraine or the US economy will be destroyed,' and on 21 January 2025, I heard 'President' Trump say, 'Russia must withdraw from the Ukraine or Russia will be destroyed.' Quite the difference. But at least Trump learned to read the Teleprompter without (or at least with less) ad-libbing between 2021 and 2025.

The real president is a well-kept secret, at least from me, and if anyone knows, they refuse to tell me who it is. Obama has been suggested as the real president from 2009 to 2025, but I, at least, can't know for certain, and I don't know who does.

 ******

I tried to listen to two Tucker Carlson shows: one show, 'FORTRESS AMERICA' with George Friedman, was about how the US rules the world, and will continue to rule the world for the foreseeable future: Russia tried to conquer the Ukraine, and, after three years, have only a tiny sliver, have lost most of their military, and will soon have to sell off all Russian assets to US oiligarchs to pay for the war. The PRC is in slightly better shape than Russia, but are totally hemmed in by US Naval assets and those assets make it impossible for the PRC to project any power at all, they could not possibly even attack Taiwan, let alone annex that American asset. And most of the rest of the world already acknowledges and gratefully accepts absolute US hegemony. Or at least the UK and EU accept it and try to look grateful.

The second show was "Embedded with Russian Troops"  where Tucker interviewed Patrick Lancaster who has been an embedded reporter with the Russians fighting the Ukrainians, and he notes that their job is to protect ethnic Russians in the Ukraine and in Russia from the Ukrainian forces who are determined to cleanse the Ukraine (and as much of Russia as possible) of ethnic Russians. Some say this is a Slav v. Slav fight, but the Western Ukrainians consider themselves Aryans, not Slavs, and are in general agreement with the book, My Struggle written in the 1920s by a future Chancellor of Germany. that all Slavs must be exterminated or at least enslaved by Aryans. Mr Lancaster is sympathetic to the ethnic Russian position in this war, and, as he notes, his pro-Russian viewpoint is soundly rejected by all the mainstream US/UK/EU media who agree that the book, My Struggle, while wrong in its anti-Semitism, was absolutely right about the Slavs.

As the US/UK/EU all said after Germany lost WWII, Hitler's killing 6 million Jews was the absolute worst crime in all history. Some ask, 'But what about Hitler also killing 27 million Slavs?' and the US/UK/EU answer is 'That just shows there's a little good in the worst of men.'

This raises the question: Where is the war in the Ukraine going?

As George Friedman says, that's obvious: Russia will lose the war and all their assets and end up an impuissant, impoverished country or, more likely, 20 small impuissant, impoverished countries.

But I fear Mr Lancaster might very well be correct that Russia will manage to survive, economy intact, and with all the ethnic Russians under Russian protection, with whatever is necessary to keep them safe from the good Aryans in the Western Ukraine, US, UK, and EU.