Getting Trump back to the US from the NATO meeting in Ankara

It was on 8 July 2026 that, after completing the NATO meeting in Ankara, Trump returned to the US. And they've been talking about his return trip ever since.

We saw Trump get on the Presidential Plane Air Force One in Ankara, and get off again after the plane landed.

Then we found out that Trump had been taken in one of the food trolleys from the new Air Force One to another plane, then back to the new Air Force One after it landed so he could be seen leaving Air Force One.

Then we learned that Mossad said that an Iranian with an antiaircraft weapon was hiding, ready to shoot down Air Force One, so Trump organised the food trolley swap for himself and two others, leaving about 200 people on the new Air Force One to be shot down.

Of course, the mainstream media are mostly anti-Trump, and want to show him as a craven coward who planned to sacrifice 200 US government workers and journalists and others to keep himself safe.

Then they wrote that the CIA checked, found that no attack was planned, and told Trump he had nothing to worry about, but Trump still had himself secretly food-cart trolleyed to another plane, while there was absolutely no Iranian terrorist waiting to shoot down Air Force One.

Some things one can rely on: after Trump was shot at a presidential campaign rally, the mainstream media ran photos of Trump with blood on his face, so Trump was indeed shot and got a fairly minor wound.

And everyone agrees that Mossad said there would definitely be an Iranian terrorist shooting at Air Force One, so someone had Trump and two others food-cart trolleyed to another plane. Did they have Trump's private number, called Trump, and Trump organised the food-cart manoeuvre, or did they call someone else, someone in security, who set up the food-cart trolley, and Trump just did as he was told? No idea. 

Some say the CIA agreed it would be better if Trump switched planes, but I've read the mainstream media that say the CIA said there was no threat, and Trump should have stayed on Air Force One.

Best guess: 1) Mossad told someone that they knew there was an Iranian terrorist waiting to shoot down Air Force One.

2) There was an Iranian terrorist with an anti-aircraft missile launcher and saying the usual Islamic chant, 'בָּרוּךְ אַתָּה אֲדֹנָי' while waiting for Air Force One to take off, but then he got a call that Trump was not on Air Force One, so don't bother.

The news reports vary, with some saying the CIA agreed that Trump should take a different plane, and others saying the CIA assured Trump that the report of an Iranian terrorist was false and he should remain on Air Force One. Both are equally believable, assuming, of course, that the CIA were fairly certain that the Iranian terrorist was waiting, and there are some in the CIA who feel like they have to do their job of protecting the president, and others who figure they have to do their job and get rid of a terrible president like Trump.

We also figure Mossad figured, if Trump were moved from one plane to another in a food trolley, it would be risible, and if Trump refused, that Iranian would have shot down Air Force One, justifying the total destruction of Iran and handing whatever was left of Iran over to the legal owners of that land, Israeli Zionists. So for Mossad, it was a win-win proposition.

And, after a month and a half, we still don't have the full story, and can be reasonably certain that we never will. 

What now???

Around 1890, the European Great Powers agreed: NO MORE WAR!

War wasted money and left the rich and powerful with a lot less for the essentials of life: servants, exotic meats, palatial homes, etc., etc., and left the poor without enough to eat, making them prose to annoying uprisings.

But then, in 1914, Germany wanted to move up a notch or two, and the UK and France did not want to move down at all, and then someone shot an Archduke, and we got WWI. 

The UK and France figured they'd win, easily, and the US banks figured the UK and France were right, so they loaned the UK and France lots and lots of money. Only the war wasn't going so well in 1917 after Russia, an ally of the UK and France, surrendered, handed all of Western Russia to Germany, and the rest of Russia became the USSR, an evil, Communist country that had to be destroyed. 

So the US of A stepped in in 1917 (since US banks had loaned the UK and France way too much money, which they had squandered and were about to lose to Germany so the US banks would have lost all their loans) and defeated Germany, so the UK and France agreed to take all the gold and silver that had been in Germany and use most of it to repay the US and keep all the rest.

So all went OK, until Adolph came up with a proposition that the British and French liked: the evil Slavs must be stopped before they overran and conquered all of Europe. So the British and French declared the WWI rule that Germany must be forever demilitarised must be relaxed: Germany could rearm to fight the evil USSR Communists.

As a boy, I read the Churchill auto-hagiographies. Churchill lied that he thundered against allowing Germany to rearm in 1933, but, checking the morgue, there are no such speeches. All the UK leadership, including Churchill, knew Germany must rearm to slow the inevitable attack by the Soviet Communists to overrun all of Europe and give the UK time to organise the Defense of Democracy against the evil Soviets.

So the Germans were allowed to elect Adolph in 1933, and the UK didn't become alarmed until 1938 when Chamberlain saw that Germany had become too strong and the UK needed time to rearm, so he signed the 'Peace in Our Time' treaty with Adolph, while he was secretly planning with France to attack Germany in 1939 (for which Churchill's Histories condemn Chamberlain, saying Germany could have very easily been defeated in 1938, and waiting until 1939 was the cause of the Defeat at Dunkirk).

The Official US Histories say the US single-handedly won WWII, invading at Normandy and defeating the Germans, developing the necessary nukes that defeated Japan, and then seeing the Soviet Union trying to take credit for helping the US to win the war when their contribution was minimal, the Soviet Army could not have advanced a single mile without US Spam! (Not clear which Spam allowed the Soviets to march as far as Berlin, the one in tins or the one in the US news media).

In any case, in the '80s and '90s the USSR collapsed, to be replaced by a weak, Slavic Russia that must be destroyed, and the Ukrainians are doing a great job of it, with the good, Aryan Ukrainians throwing the Slavic Ukrainians against Russian artillery while the good Europeans send massive waves of advanced drones into Russia, using Starlink to guide those drones around the Russian air defences and then killing Russian Slavs at beaches, dorms, and shopping malls, and destroying Russian oil sites and Wildberries, and, since they are protected by Article 5, Russia can do nothing to stop them, Russia can only kill Ukrainians, who are totally expendable.

Net: It's looking like All is for the Best in this, the Best of all possible Worlds! 

Money?

For many years, gold was the only real currency. The British had a gold guinea and paper guineas, but one could always exchange a paper guinea for a gold guinea. The Germans had a gold mark. The US dollar, well, actually a US $20 bill could be exchanged for gold.

Then came WWI, and Germany lost, and had to hand over all German gold as war reparations, so the mark became worthless, and we heard many stories like the German who sold a home, put the marks from the sale of the home in the bank, and got a cheque for his deposit in the mail since the value was too small for an account, and the cheque was for less than the cost of the stamp on the envelope.

With all the German gold, the UK and French currencies could still be redeemed for gold, but then came WWII: France lost in 1940, and the French franc became almost worthless.

The UK won, but had spent so much on the war they could no longer redeem UK currency for gold, so the £ left the ranks of the Great Currencies.

But the US could still redeem US$35 for gold, so Bretton-Woods made the US$ the world Key Currency: Anyone not a US citizen or permanent resident could redeem US dollars for gold (US citizens were legally not allowed to own gold). The world used the US$ for international trade. Even the USSR  accumulated lots of US$ to use for international trade.

Until 1971, when President Nixon said the US would no longer redeem US dollars with gold, and the value of the US dollar fell, but not all that much, since the US$ remained (and remains) the World Key Currency, a fact the evil enemies of the US would like to fix. But those enemies of the US not only don't know what to do about the US$, they somehow remain restrained by Bretton-Woods even though the basis of Bretton-Woods was that the US$ was the only currency that could be redeemed for gold, which is no longer true, but the US$ still remains the world's only Key Currency (of course, as the US government spend $trillions more each year than they take in as income, Faith in the Dollar is not what it once was).

The many enemies of the US can scream all they want, but the US$ remains the Key Currency, even though it can no longer be redeemed for gold, but the US still control SWIFT, and the easiest way to do international trade is to use SWIFT and the US$, and since that is such a popular and useful system, the US weaponised it, and made it difficult for nations to do international trade without SWIFT and the US$.

So the evil Chinese and Russians are desperately looking for some way to create alternatives to SWIFT that are not controlled by the US.

If one reads US analysts, it will be impossible to create an alternative to SWIFT, because SWIFT is too entrenched in global trade.

If one reads Russian/Chinese/Iranian sources, an alternative to SWIFT is coming 'very soon now'. 

Who's Winning?????

If one reads the US/UK/EU mainstream media, Russia are being destroyed by the plucky Ukrainians who have managed to build themselves materiel entirely from Ukrainian material and are now striking deep into Russia, killing those evil Russians, destroying Russian industry and oil production and Wildberries stores, and the Russians can only murder civilians, which does nothing to impede the Ukrainian military effort.

'But aren't the Russians military making progress against the Ukrainian military?' those who never follow the mainstream media might ask, when those who read or watch or listen to the US/UK/EU mainstream media know the Russians are losing badly and will soon be totally destroyed, almost certainly before the end of 2022.

If one watches podcasts, presumably financed by the Kremlin, they'll tell you the Russians are winning, that the Russian attempt to blockade the Black Sea is succeeding, that the Ukraine are now landlocked and Kiev is on fire. But, if one sticks to the mainstream US/UK/EU media, all this is false, and total victory for the Ukrainians is rapidly approaching.

(It appears that many now prefer the podcasts for their news, since our respected elders who learned that CNN/BBC/France24/DW were the most reliable sources of news are rapidly retiring from this mortal coil.) 

Iran is a bit less clear. While the Iranians are all fanatical terrorists with only the most primitive of weapons, the mainstream media all know that Trump, the undisputed leader of the fight against the terrorist Iranian regime, is the worst president in the history of presidents, so he has managed to turn a simple, very easy total victory with return of the Shah and all the BP oil and gas into an embarrassing and totally unnecessary defeat.

Anyone could have kept the Strait open, but Trump managed to let the Iranians close it. Anyone could have easily reopened that Strait, but Trump, as only Trump could have done, has managed to mangle that reopening.

Of course, one must give Trump some credit. He did frequently say, 'I have reopened the Strait!' shortly after someone bought puts on oil, and also said, 'The Iranians have managed to close the Strait' shortly after someone bought calls. And he got a law passed that the Revenue Service can't check his taxes. So he did get one thing right, even if he got every other thing wrong, which is why Iran now has an Ayatollah, instead of a Shah, and control of the Strait until 2029 when the new president will very quickly get the Strait reopened and, we're all certain, will also bring the Shah back.

We're all expecting that the next President of the US, after taking office on 20 January 2029, will quickly bring victory for Ukraine and defeat for Russia and Iran, followed by making Taiwan the 51st state. 

What Next???

They polled all the Iranians in the US/UK/EU, and more than 90% said they want an Iran without any Ayatollahs, preferably under a Shah, and they would strongly support any effort to make that happen.

So Israel and the US have been trying to give the Iranians what more than 90% say they want, with help from the UK and EU.

On Friday, 13 June 2025, Israel sent drones to the homes of all the Iranian generals, killing all of them and their families, and also to the homes of all the professors of nuclear science, killing all of them and their families. Then, for about 9 days, Israel kept bombing Iran (from outside Iran, since Iran have anti-aircraft weapons), then said they needed help from the US, so Trump ordered a massive bombing campaign that totally destroyed all Iranian nuclear research and development facilities. And Iran retaliated by hitting the US military base in Qatar, but only after telling the US when and where they would hit the US military base in Qatar, so no Americans were injured and no American materièl was damaged.

Every decent person knows that the US and Israel always tell the TRVTH, the whole TRVTH, and nothing but the TRVTH, unless the TRVTH is Classified TS/SCI/NOFORN/BBR, in which case they can only give out the unclassified bits of the TRVTH. It appears Israel told the truth about getting rid of all the generals and nuclear physics professors, but every general had a 2nd in Command, and every professor also had a 2nd, so the 2nds took over for the generals and nuclear physics professors. The President of Iran was injured but not killed, and the Ayatollah wasn't home. Iran's attempts at retaliation all failed, since they used American GPS which was programmed to give wrong directions to the Iranians.

In December, 2025, the US Secretary of the Treasury went to all the computers that handle Iranian money and paid them to crash it: one day, it was worth enough to buy stuff, the next day it had a value of 0.000000 and no Iranian could buy anything. Many Iranians went into the streets to protest, and 40,000 good, pro-democracy fighters were sent into Iran with Starlink terminals. Sadly, some very evil nation gave the Iranian government some anti-Starlink devices that not only block Starlink, but also allow the Iranian government to track down and arrest all those with Starlink terminals.

Those peaceful protesters tried to bring freedom to Iran by killing police and the Iranian sheep who followed the government, and it is said that the evil Iranian government murdered more than 80,000 of them (when only 40,000 had Starlink and could be tracked and arrested, but we figure the evil Iranian government must have found and killed 80,000 of those peaceful, innocent protestors who did nothing wrong, after all, killing the evil Iranian police is clearly an attempt to bring freedom and prosperity to Iran, and those doing it can never be considered as anything but peaceful freedom fighters who only want peace and democracy).

In any case, the US have been trying since 1979 to eradicate the evil Iranian theocracy and bring freedom, peace, and the return of all BP assets to BP shareholders, and whatever the US do is the RIGHT THING, and must be done.

And all decent people hope the US will succeed this time in their project to make Iran a part of Greater Israel, since the Millennium cannot start until everything from the northernmost tip of the Euphrates to the southernmost tip of the Nile belongs to the good Zionists.

(Please don't get distracted by the original Hebrew that says Israel goes only as far south as the wadi, a Hebrew word that has nothing to do with a river.) 

Swiftly Losing Money

When the Shah was in charge of Iran, one could go to Iran with a Mastercard or Visa or any other major credit card or Traveler's Cheques and pretty much spend them, getting Iranian currency as change, and, upon leaving, one could change all Iranian currency back to the currency of wherever one was going next.

Then the Ayatollah took over, and the US cut Iran off from all International Finance. Anyone going to Iran had to bring US dollars, change them in Iranian currency at whatever rate Iran set, and probably be unable to change your Iranian currency back into some Internationally recognised currency when you left, because the US had complete control over all International Banking. The US built the system that allows money to move freely between nations, and so the US can cut off any nation they wish to cut off, and the US wish the Ayatollahs would go away and let the Shah come back, take over, and return all the BP oil that was stolen when the Ayatollah took over in 1979.

The two big countries where US bans the international money network that allows credit cards to work just about everywhere are Russia and Iran, but also countries like the DPRK, Cuba, Myanmar, Sudan, and a few others that have recently gone pro-US but the banking system hasn't been fully reintegrated, such as Venezuela.

But times are changing. The PRC want to trade with as many different countries as possible as easily as possible, and have set up banking networks independent of the US international monetary system (based in Belgium).

 Life is easier for those doing international transactions if one can use SWIFT, but, where there are great bargains banned by SWIFT, some are using some of the other systems, such as the PRC or the Russian system (I understand Iran now uses the PRC system to sell oil to the PRC and buy PRC manufactured products, and it makes these transactions fairly facile).

The US are determined to destroy any international monetary systems trying to compete with SWIFT, but the US are now playing against some rather large, powerful competitors, a game with which the US are not terribly familiar.

So, as of now, no one knows how this is going to turn out, but Iran and Russia are looking forward to finding out.