Scott Ritter says Russia are winning. What next?

All of NATO are against Russia, determined to win, and all the Western media must reiterate the official Western narrative: Putin's invasion of the Ukraine was the biggest mistake any Russian ever made, the Ukraine, with advanced US weapons, destroyed the "outmoded and inept" Russian weapons, shot down every Russian aeroplane, destroyed all the Russian tanks, killed just about all the Russian troops that invaded. And the sanctions completely destroyed the Russian economy, which was entirely based on selling oil and gas to the West and using the money to buy everything Russia needed from the West.

However,  Scott Ritter et al. report accurately about the war in the Ukraine, and the Western narrative is not altogether accurate. Mr Ritter, who has accurate information about the Ukraine and refuses to abide by US/EU law that one must always reiterate the official Western narrative, says that Russia are winning in the Ukraine. And anyone who can count knows that the Russia economy has survived the Western sanctions, selling to the East and South, making more money than before the sanctions, having the world's strongest currency.

The war in the Ukraine has, as its objective, the complete destruction of Russia. Russia must lose badly until Putin is overthrown and the new regime agree to all NATO conditions: Russia must be broken up into several small, unarmed states, all Russian energy resources must go to US oil and gas barons as reparations. A beneficial side effect is the complete economic destruction of Germany: Germany's prosperity was entirely based on cheap Russian energy, and with energy from the US oil and gas barons at four or more times the price, Germany is no longer competitive, no one can afford to pay four times what they were paying to buy German output, so the German economy is already collapsing, and things will only get worse. German industries can only survive if they can relocate to the US where they will be able to buy affordable energy. Maybe.

The raisons d'etre for NATO were 1) to keep the US in, and almost all of Europe are now a US neocolony, so the US are in as neoImperialist; 2) to keep the USSR (now Russia) out, and the neocolony of Europe are now prohibited by law from any economic interaction with Russia, the only allowed interaction is to support the US military conquest of Russia, so Russia are out; and 3) to keep Germany down, and the German economy is imploding without access to the cheap Russian energy that gave Germany their competitive advantage.

So it is win, win, win for NATO!

Except that Russia are winning in the Ukraine. The US as World Hegemon is under severe threat.

So will the US decide that having no World at all is better than losing their World Hegemony? Do the US leadership figure their bunkers will be safe from Russian retaliation? The US president says Armageddon is upon us, and he should know.