Is the US about to destroy Iran and put a Shah as ruler, just like 1953???

An Arab friend sent me a bunch of screenshots of some Flight Radar or Flight Aware displays of all the aircraft in the air over Qatar, and then showed another screenshot of the same plane flying near San Diego, CA and said this shows the US will destroy the Ayatollah regime in Iran and put in the Shah in a day or two. He also had a screenshot showing a US military refueling plane over Iraq, and an unidentified flying object (information blacked out by whoever sent it) flying over the Gulf with Two Names that lies between Qatar and Iran, and said this was an armed drone of some kind. I asked, 'Predator?' and he said, 'No, but I can't say any more.'

He said Iran are very weak, the entire Army will desert as soon as the first American bombs start falling, then something like the Venezuela raid, but taking out the government, not abducting it, and Iran will gleefully welcome the return of a Shah.

I noted that those same sources say Russia are losing badly in the Ukraine, that Russia have no supply lines, so the Russian soldiers in the Ukraine have nothing to eat but their dead comrades, killed by the advanced NATO weapons that the Ukrainians are using to demolish the Russian army which only have old Soviet weapons from WWII, patched together with washing machine parts. Since he is Orthodox, he says those sources are obviously wrong, and no one believes them, but the sources reporting that Iran are on the verge of defeat are obviously correct.

I tried to point out that his two distinct sources, one completely reliable and the other completely unreliable are, in fact, the same source, but he replied that I obviously don't know anything, just look at the pictures and Iran's immediate return to the Shah is obviously just a few days, maybe just a few hours away, while Russia's victory is obvious and probably very soon.

It was an interesting Friday night chat. I can't say that I learned anything, except that reading two stories from the same source, he figures they are either two completely different sources, or one source that have some accurate reporters and some totally inaccurate reporters.