Bessent said he deliberately crashed the Iranian currency to destroy the Iranian economy in late December 2025. In anticipation of protests over the crashed (by the US) Iranian currency, Mossad, the CIA, and MI6 sent in 40,000 foot soldiers with Starlink terminals, and they were directed (from Mossad in Israel, CIA in the US, and MI6 in the UK) to piles of weapons and where to gather with other foot soldiers to kill security officers and protesters not aligned with the pro-Shah forces.
About 3,000 were killed, mostly Iranian security forces and civilians, plus several hundred of the good, (US-, UK-) law-abiding protestors.
Of course, the US/UK/EU mainstream media note that that figure of 3,000 is Iranian propaganda, and scream that more than 30,000, maybe more than 40,000, maybe more than 70,000 peaceful protestors have been brutally murdered by the evil Ayatollahs.
It seems the brilliant Mossad/CIA/MI6 plan ran into a little snag: the evil PRC and Russia gave Iran systems that could disable Starlink, track down the locations of all the Starlink terminals, and then arrest the foot-soldier agents sent to start the overthrow of the Ayatollahs and return of the Shah (who is the son of the former Shah).
But the violent rioters sent by Mossad, the CIA, and MI6 all having been arrested, the Ayatollah was still firmly in control, so the planned 14 Jan 2026 US attack had to be postponed, as was the 6 Feb attack and the 15 Feb attack.
On 19 Feb, Trump said he was giving Iran just 10 days to comply with all US demands: no uranium in Iran, complete de-militarisation, no resistance to return of the Shah and return of all Iranian oil to the rightful owner: BP.
Ten days would mean 1 March 2026, but Trump later extended the deadline to 15 days, or 6 March 2026.
At this point, the top decision makers in the CIA/MI6/Mossad seem to be unsure how to proceed: the evil Russians and PRC militaries have been helping Iran prepare their defences, and the size and effectiveness of those defences may or may not be fully understood.
Plan A says that the US have detailed knowledge of the locations of all Iranian weapons, and the US stealth-planes can easily evade all Iranian radar detection, so the hundreds of planes and missiles fired from ships and US military bases will destroy all the Iranian weapons, kill all the senior government officials, military officers, and Ayatollahs, and leave Iran ripe for the picking, with the Ayatollahs replaced by the Shah just as easily as Maduro was replaced by President Trump (who now calls himself the effective president of Venezuela).
But there are sceptics who think the evil Russians and PRC might have defensive weapons that can conceal the whereabouts of the Iranian offensive weapons, and then just might, a remote possibility but still a possibility, sink one or more of the ships in the Armada(s), shoot down one or more of those US stealth planes, and might have a few well-hidden missiles that could do serious damage to Israel, US military bases, Arabian Gulf oil fields, and close the Strait of Hormuz with Russian and PRC mines.
One strange thing is that, on Friday, February 13th, Scott Ritter said that Trump would not dare order an attack on Iran, since the chance of unacceptable US losses was too high, but on Monday, February 16th, he said that a US attack on Iran was imminent, possibly before the end of the week. He repeated that again this Monday, February 23, that the attack is almost (but not quite) certain, and very soon, maybe early in the morning one day this week or next.
Scott says that, if ordered to attack, the US know the location of every Iranian missile, and can take most of them out. There will be a few missiles that will get missed, missiles that the military call 'leakers', but this is why the US have put in lots of additional anti-missile defence systems to protect US assets and Israel from those 'leakers'.
Ideally, Scott says, there will be no US or Israeli casualties, with US air defences and Israel's Iron Dome easily able to protect US military forces and all Israelis from the Iranian 'leakers'.
But Scott says that success for the US attack, while very likely, is not absolutely certain, and there might be some US and Israeli casualties.
Scott is hoping that the top generals will warn Trump that, while success is almost certain, there is still a chance that US and Israeli lives could be lost if the US attack Iran, and Scott thinks that Trump is a coward, and hopes that Trump will be so cowardly that he will refrain from ordering an attack.
Scott, like a lot of people, detests Trump more than he has ever disliked any other president. I, however, saw Trump go on TV and say,
'I order all US troops out of Syria!.' Twice!
Then the men in dark suits and dark glasses asked Trump if he wanted to be the next JFK, since the US hadn't had a good president's funeral in more than 50 years, and Trump asked, 'What do I have to do?' and the next day, Trump ordered US troops into Syria.
Proving Trump, like Biden and Obama and Bush, Jr. are all just actors playing the part of the US president, reading the lines the real president gives them to read off the Teleprompter.
But I don't know if the person really in charge will order an attack that might fail, or will just hope that the Iranians are foolish enough to surrender, and if they aren't, won't risk an attack that could do serious damage to the US military.
We've also been 'promised' an attack at least four times now, but no attack, and there is a high cost to having an Armada sitting and doing nothing, so we need that promised attack to finally come about very soon now, or the fleet will need to sail home.
No comments:
Post a Comment